|
|
|
|
|
|
Lucien Foort is one of the fastest rising stars in Holland.
His brand of funky, techy house and excellent selection policy
has won him fans all over the world. This interview was
conducted when he was in KL in early 2002.
Lucien Foort Interview
courtesy of Kent
A lot of big name DJs are coming out of Holland – you,
Sander Kleinenberg, DJ Tiesto, Jurgen, what is it about
Holland?
I think that we’ve finally found our way in terms of
dance music and we’ve found a way to distribute that on a
global scale. We’re now 100% participants of the global
dance floor, which I think is very important because you can
only do so much in your own country. To be a part of that,
being from Holland – which is a small country – makes us
[the Dutch] very happy.
Signum, the trance house duo that played Gatecrasher for
KENT Choice Osmosis at Movement are also from Holland. Did you
guys meet up?
I heard they live close to me [in Rotterdam] but I had
never met them so I did make an effort to go and see them when
Gatecrasher played Movement. Very nice geezers. It was great
to speak Dutch with them especially as we’re on the other
side of the world. They were pretty nervous before their gig
but I thought they did a good job representing the groovy and
happy sound of Holland.
So the Dutch have a sound then?
Yes. It’s something to do with the beat, I can recognize
it instantly.
|
|
The sudden influx of Dutch DJs and dance producers and
remixers into the international scene suggests that Holland is
a hotbed of dance music. What say you?
You need a certain level of development before you see a
“sudden influx". I was one of the early birds in
Holland doing dance music and I can say that it’s taken ten
years to grow, so it’s probably about time we made our mark
on the map. Guys like Tiesto and Ferry Corsten have been
paving the roads for Sander Kleinenberg, Armand van Buren and
me.
In terms of Dutch dance DJs, have you got a personal
favourite?
To say something about a DJ you have to listen to them more
than once so I can’t really say anything, especially if
I’m coming into a club and hearing the last five minutes of
some DJ before doing my set. In terms of professionalism, I
just toured with Armand Van Buren in Australia.
Despite having only just met Signum, you knew the rest
of the Gatecrasher crew from having worked with them and of
course, even when you were touring Australia, which is half
way across the world from Holland, you did so with fellow
countryman Armin van Buren. Is the world getting smaller or is
the dance community a small one?
The dance community is not that big. When you get to a
certain level you’ll find that there’s only a couple of
people that determine what shape the dance music market is
going to take. Pete Tong for example. He’s one of the most
influential figures in the dance music world. With Essential
Mix he gets DJs that no one’s heard of to do mixes alongside
the big DJs. But yes, once you’ve get to that level
everything is pretty much centred around a couple of big DJs,
then it goes down in a pyramid in terms of the whole
structure.
You did a particularly spectacular Essential Mix for
Pete Tong.
To do an Essential Mix for the first time in your life and
get nominated for Best Radio 1 Essential Mix at the MUZIK
Magazine Dance Awards this year, I was pretty shocked when it
happened! It [the award] eventually went to Sander Kleinenberg,
which I thought was well deserved. Over this last year, I’ve
only really just got started on a global level, whereas
Kleinenberg’s been touring for two and a half years. But,
I’ll get another shot at it next year.
Still, another notch in the Dutch scene’s bedpost, eh?
You’re personal best set was also laid down on home ground,
wasn’t it?
One of my top sets was in Hague, Holland’s capital. It
was a free pop festival called Bevrijdings. It’s one of
these gigs where you can’t plan anything. You just play and
see if you can work with the crowd, so you tend to play all
the way across the spectrum. I play very widely – breakbeats,
tech house, progressive, trance, progressive house, even
techno. There were in total 400,000 people there and I think I
had 50,000 at my stage and it was outside in the park.
There’s no one gig where I’d say this is the one and
nothing’s going to match it, but it’s definitely the gig
I’d look back on and say wow!
|
|
Is there anywhere that you haven’t played that you really
fancy playing?
I haven’t played in Russia and I haven’t played in
South Africa. It curiosity, to be honest – I’ve never been
there – and because I’d like to be part of the global
dance floor there.
,b>You’ve got numerous residencies in Holland and the
UK. Give us the lowdown.
I’ve two residencies in Holland centred around the first
and last week of the month. There’s Stalker in Haarlem,
which is at a very small club for 350 people – very nice in
terms of checking your records on the ground. The other is
Progress, which is to do with taking people as far as we can
and giving them an insight into dance music and bring the
global dance floor to Rotterdam’s backyard. The DJs that I
bring out for that have included Stacey Pullen, Cohen Hamilton
from Lush in Ireland, Danny Howells, Anthony Pappa, Jimmy Van
M, Ashley Casselle… It’s been pretty UK orientated, just
because UK is closer [to Holland], although Kasey Taylor from
Vapour Recordings in Australia has played twice. Then
there’s every month at Gatecrasher in Sheffield, every two
months at Cream and every two months at Lush.
You’ve said that dance music on TV is different from
what dance music really is.
I don’t see it as different but the focus is on something
else. If you want a lot of people to like something [which is
true of TV], you are going to go for concepts that are quite
easy to grasp. Whereas if you experience dance music for what
it is you’ll probably be standing on a dance floor and
experiencing a sensation, rather than hearing or seeing a
concept that some company been thinking out. With them it’s,
“we need this to stick in someone’s brain in three and a
half minutes so that the next question they ask is ‘where
can I buy this?’” because that what commercialism is all
about. If I can avoid my sets becoming too commercial, too
big, too anthemy, too ‘this is now and next week you won’t
hear it again’, then I can give people an insight into what
dance music really is.
Your funky melodic tech house sound stretches across the
board of house music and you certainly don’t limit your
playing according to specific genres. Will that sort of
diversity be the eventual direction that DJ sets take in the
future?
DJs nowadays have become so big they’re the supplier of
music, so they can’t play just one particular style of
music. And with simultaneous mixing, where you don’t talk
into the mike [and introduce the next track] you do need to be
smart about how you move between musical styles smoothly.
Also, if you say you’re going to be a DJ, you have to know
your music and appeal to a lot of people and play different
styles of music, left and right.
Does that mean no more ‘techno nights’ or ‘prog
house’ nights?
Again, it comes down to marketing. People have to put a
stamp on something otherwise you can’t sell it. If you
don’t, how are people going to know what they like or what
they hate. They have to have a marker to differentiate.
Obviously, you are going to call progressive house,
“progressive house”, but what is “progressive house”?
Dave Seaman, Timo Mass, Danny Howells, they all play
progressive house, but Timo Mass is a little more techno
orientated, Danny Howells is a little more house orientated
and Dave Seaman is a little more trance orientated. In a year
from now those different styles will be even more diverse but
they will still be classified under the same name,
“progressive house”.
|
|
You’ve remixed for labels such as Bedrock, Positiva, 3
Beat and React and you even released the second installment of
your own mix series Singularity on United Records, but you
didn’t do as much production in 2001 as you would have liked
to. What can we look forward in 2002?
In 2001, I played so much and it’s been time consuming.
However, in the last two weeks [prior to coming to KL] I
completed two productions and in 2002 I’m going to work my
schedule around being in my new studio. I can do more domestic
gigs or gigs in the UK, for me that’s 45 minutes on the
plane. And I’ll center tours round the times I don’t need
to be in the studio. I also work in Manchester with Evolution
on Fluid Recordings, but I’m focusing on my stuff at the
moment, as it’s been a while since I’ve released some
tunes. I have been working on the new Funk Function track. The
A-side is finished and I’ll be playing that in KL off the
CD. So, by the end of January I’ll have a couple of tracks
ready.
Dutch Liquid productions are a firm favourite with Carl
Cox. Tell us about it.
Dutch Liquid is a collaboration between Ron Matser and
myself. He’s one of my old mates from way back when and he
gave me my first gig in a decent club. He had one of the first
progressive clubs in Rotterdam and basically, you could play
whatever you liked there although we found out later we were
playing progressive house. Anyway, he comes out to my studio
and brings loads of samples with him and we discuss where
we’re going to go with them. The results are more techno
orientated and minimal than the stuff I do on my own and
it’s [the collaboration] is a completely different working
environment than I’m use to – when he goes away I don’t
tamper with it [our work], I wait till he gets back and we
finish it together – but that’s good.
A nomination at the MUZIK Magazine Dance Awards, the
release of Singularity Vol. 2 and big ups from numerous big
name DJs, including Sasha, who reckons your music is “funky
as hell”. 2001 was your year. Are you sad to see it come to
an end or are you looking forward to 2002?
If you plant a seed in the ground and you see it evolve
into a plant you do hope it will be a tree with a solid
foundation that will last for the rest of your life. In terms
of DJing for me the foundations have been laid, so yes, I’m
looking forward to next year and seeing how my work evolves.
>back
|
|
|